Caren v. Providence Health Sys. Or. (In re Caren)
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFlynn, J.
**468The dispute in this workers' compensation case arises from the intersection of overlapping statutory provisions that control the determination of a worker's permanent partial disability. ORS 656.214 obligates employers to provide compensation for a worker's permanent impairment, meaning "loss of use or function" that is "due to the compensable industrial injury." ORS 656.214(1)(a). But another statute limits the employer's liability when the compensable injury combines with a qualifying "preexisting condition" to "cause or prolong" the injured worker's' disability or need for medical…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Brown v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2017
- Olson v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Barrett v. D & H DRYWALLOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Barrett v. D & H DrywallOregon Supreme Court · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Johnson v. SAIFOregon Supreme Court · 2022
- Simi v. LTI Inc. - Lynden Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2021
- Johnson v. SAIFCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- Robinette v. SAIFOregon Supreme Court · 2022
- Robinette v. SAIFCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.