Legal Opinion
Schleiss v. SAIF Corp.
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided December 27, 2013No. WCB 0905174; CA A146996; SC S060774PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.
Our review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (the board) that made a permanent partial disability (PPD) award to claimant requires us to determine whether OAR 436-035-0013 (2009), an administrative rule adopted by the Director of the Department of Consumer and Business Services (DCBS), is inconsistent with the statutes that the Director intended to implement. We review to determine whether the board has erroneously interpreted a provision of law. ORS 183.482(8)(a)(B). For the reasons that follow, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals, and we remand this case to the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Smothers v. Gresham Transfer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. KleinOregon Supreme Court · 2012
- Olson v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Oregon Occupational Safety & Health Division v. CBI Services, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2014
- Brown v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2017
- Blanchana, LLC v. Bureau of Labor and IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- Caren v. Providence Health Sys. Or. (In re Caren)Oregon Supreme Court · 2019
- SAIF Corp. v. Carlos-MaciasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.