Legal Opinion
Saxton v. SAIF Corp.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided August 13, 1986No. WCB 83-10671; CA A36554PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.
The issue in this workers’ compensation case is whether claimant, who successfully defended a referee’s award of penalties and attorney fees in an insurer’s appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Board, is entitled to attorney fees under ORS 656.382(2), even though the insurer was successful in persuading the Board to overturn the referee’s award of additional temporary total disability and to reduce the award of permanent partial disability.
ORS 656.382(2) provides:
“If a request for hearing, request for review, appeal or cross-appeal to the Court of Appeals or petition for review to the Supreme…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Barrett v. D & H DRYWALLOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Barrett v. D & H DrywallOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- Dotson v. Bohemia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Mobley v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Barrett v. D & H DrywallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cayton v. Safelite Glass Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- SAIF Corp. v. TranerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Taylor v. SAIFCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
- Nero v. City of TualatinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- SAIF Corp. v. SeversonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.