Legal Opinion

Surratt v. Gunderson Bros. Engineering Corp.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1971PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*67HOLMAN, J.

Claimant injured Ms back while -worMng for defendant, a direct responsibility employer under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. As a result of the injury, claimant subsequently had some of the vertebrae in his lower back fused. The operation was only partially successful, leaving him with a pseudarthrosis, a false joint produced by an imperfect fusion of the vertebrae. The dispute involves the amount of his disability.

Claimant originally was awarded permanent partial disability equal to 40 per cent loss of an arm by separation for unscheduled disability to his back. He demanded a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hannan v. Good Samaritan HospitalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  2. Hannan v. Good Samaritan HospitalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  3. OMLIE ET UX v. HuntOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Ryf v. Hoffman Construction CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Kajundzich v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Weller v. Union Carbide Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Sahnow v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Deaton v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  4. Hewing v. Alaska Workmen's Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Barrett v. D & H DRYWALLOregon Supreme Court · 1985

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API