Legal Opinion

Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. Goduto

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 16, 2008No. AC 28900PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETERS, J.

The right of a mortgagee to initiate a foreclosure action against a defaulting debtor depends on the mortgagee’s compliance with the notice provisions contained in the mortgage. Fidelity Bank v. Krenisky, 72 Conn. App. 700, 707, 807 A.2d 968, cert. denied, 262 Conn. 915, 811 A.2d 1291 (2002); Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. Porto, 41 Conn. App. 598, 602, 677 A.2d 10 (1996). In this case, the trial court held that foreclosure was proper because each of two notices sent by the mortgagee satisfied the requirement in the mortgage that the debtor be given thirty days notice of his…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jacob & Youngs, Inc. v. KentNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Tallmadge Bros. v. Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  3. Kelley v. BonneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  5. Levine v. MasseySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Aurora Loan Services, LLC v. CondronConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  2. Cornelius v. RosarioConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  3. Ulster Savings Bank v. 28 Brynwood Lane, Ltd.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  4. Blacker v. CrapoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  5. TD Bank, N.A. v. J & M Holdings, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API