Legal Opinion

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Murphy

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 1, 1988No. 13206PublishedCited by 97 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.

The sole issue in this appeal is whether an insured who belatedly gives notice of an insurable claim can nonetheless recover on the insurance contract by rebutting the presumption that his delay has been prejudicial to the insurance carrier. The plaintiff, Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, brought an action against the defendant, George A. Murphy III, to recover for damage he allegedly caused to a building it had insured. The defendant then filed a third party complaint impleading his comprehensive liability insurer, Federal Insurance Company, Chubb Group of Insurance Companies (hereinafter…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Brakeman v. Potomac Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Jacob & Youngs, Inc. v. KentNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. Cooper v. Government Employees InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
  4. Johnson Controls, Inc. v. BowesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  5. Oregon Automobile Insurance v. SalzbergWashington Supreme Court · 1975

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. Connell v. ColwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. PAJ, Inc. v. Hanover Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Alcazar v. HayesTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Ferrando v. Auto-Owners Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. American Justice Insurance Reciprocal v. HutchisonTennessee Supreme Court · 2000

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API