Legal Opinion

Carling v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 21, 1993No. 89-08425; CA A70736Published

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board upholding the denial of his claim on the basis of various psychological conditions. We review the Board’s order for errors of law,1 ORS 656.298(6); ORS 183.482(8), and reverse.

Claimant has a history of psychological problems. Following an accepted occupational injury in 1988, he filed a claim for various psychological conditions, including post-traumatic stress disorder. Employer denied his claim. The referee found that claimant did not suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder, but that his compensable injury materially…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. Patitucci v. Boise Cascade CorporationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  3. Williams v. Gates, McDonald & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Grace v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. Boeing Co. v. ViltrakisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API