Legal Opinion

Boeing Co. v. Viltrakis

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 22, 1992No. 89-24484; CA A70217PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board holding that claimant is entitled to treatment for the effects of stress allegedly caused by a compensable injury. We conclude that the Board applied the correct legal analysis and that its finding that the need for treatment is related to claimant’s compensable injury and is, therefore, compensable is supported by substantial evidence.

Claimant injured his knee while working for employer, which accepted the claim and paid benefits for temporary disability and permanent partial disability. Claimant’s doctor permanently…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. Gates, McDonald & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Grace v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  3. Jeld-Wen, Inc. v. PageCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  4. Nordstrom, Inc. v. GaulCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. American Nursing v. YostCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. SAIF Corp. v. HukariCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. Aetna Casualty Co. v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. Atlas Cylinder v. EpsteinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. Boeing Co. v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. Carling v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API