Legal Opinion

Williams v. Gates, McDonald & Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1985No. WCB 80-10620; CA A32940; SC S31896PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

Claimant seeks review of a Court of Appeals’ decision holding that the long-term consequences resulting from an operation that was required as a preliminary procedure to the operation necessitated by the industrial injury were not compensable. We hold that the consequences are compensable, and therefore, reverse.

The following is taken from the Court of Appeals opinion:

“Claimant was injured in March, 1978, while working for Owens Illinois Corporation in a job which required repetitive lifting. She saw a series of physicians after the injury. They prescribed conservative treatment, but she…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sahnow v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  2. McDonough v. National Hospital Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Wheeler v. Boise Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Williams v. Gates, McDonald & Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. SAIF Corp. v. SpragueOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Van Blokland v. OR. HEALTH SCIENCES UNIVERSITYCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. Fenton v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. SAIF Corp. v. HukariCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation Division v. GirardotWyoming Supreme Court · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API