Legal Opinion
Grace v. SAIF Corp.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 20, 1985No. WCB 83-01053; CA A31584PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
Claimant seeks compensation for treatment and temporary total disability for a disabling psychological condition. The Workers’ Compensation Board held that his psychological condition was not related to his industrial injury and that he was otherwise medically stationary. On de novo review, we reverse and remand.
Claimant suffered a compensable back injury on June 19, 1980. His claim was closed in September, 1980, with an award of temporary total disability, but it was reopened in 1982 for additional treatment, including back surgery. He was thereafter determined to be physically medically…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Weller v. Union Carbide Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Hutcheson v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Wheeler v. Boise Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Price v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Dean v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Destael v. Nicolai Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Boeing Co. v. ViltrakisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Hansen v. Weyerhaeuser CompanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Nordstrom, Inc. v. GaulCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Sullivan v. Banister Pipeline AMCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.