Legal Opinion

Patitucci v. Boise Cascade Corporation

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 23, 1972No. 365-531PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoley, J.

The question presented in this workmen’s compensation case is whether the circuit court erred in finding claimant permanently and totally disabled as a result of her industrial accident of May 16, 1967.

The claimant, 56 years old at the time of her compensation hearing, had been employed for more than 25 years in general office work and secretarial work. She was unmarried, lived with an older sister and had a high school education plus some additional training in shorthand and typing. At the time of the injury involved here, she was employed by Boise Cascade Corporation as a secretary. On May…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Keefer v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Kehoe v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Watson v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  4. Rios v. Timber Structures, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Valtinson v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  2. Fuentes v. Santa Fe Public SchoolsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Matter of Compensation of AquillonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. Ferguson v. Industrial Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. Bloomfield v. National Union InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API