Legal Opinion

Carter v. Waste

California Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1910No. S.F. No. 5662PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate directed to the Superior Court of Alameda County. William H. Waste, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAn Gellotti, J.

This is an application for a writ of mandate to compel respondent to settle, allow, and sign petititioner’s proposed statement on motion for a new trial in the matter of the final distribution of the estate of John J. Fleming, deceased, who died intestate. The matter was submitted to us upon a demurrer to the petition.

The facts, so far as they may be considered material are as follows: On February 8,1908, subsequent to the settlement of the final account of the administrator of said estate, petitioner filed her petition for final distribution, alleging, among other things, that the true name…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In re BauquierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. In re Estate of SandersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Ryer v. RyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Estate of Moore v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. In Re Estate of FranklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Middlebrook v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. In Re the Guardianship of the Person & Estate of BundyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. In Re Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Elkins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Budde v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API