In Re the Guardianship of the Person & Estate of Bundy
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Sacramento County appointing a guardian of the person and estate of an incompetent person. Malcolm C. Glenn, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
PREWETT, J.,
pro tem.—On petition of one Edna Miller, a niece, the above-named appellant was adjudged incompetent by the superior court of the county of Sacramento and a guardian appointed for his person and estate.
The appellant, Bundy, in his answer alleged that he was a resident of the county of Los Angeles and denied the jurisdiction of the court. In addition to this, he denied the allegations as to his incompetency and demanded, in writing, that the issues be tried before a jury. A jury was accordingly impaneled and a trial was had. The jury disagreed and the court thereupon announced that…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Smith v. WesterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- In Re Estate of DolbeerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Morrison v. LandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Estate of Moore v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Fowler v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Hellman Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. AldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Sullivan v. DunneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Christiansen v. ChristiansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Penney v. Pritchard & McCallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.