Legal Opinion
City & County of San Francisco v. Public Utilities Commission
California Supreme Court
Decided August 15, 1985No. S.F. 24687PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
The present petition for a writ to review Decision No. 83-10-035 of respondent California Public Utilities Commission (hereinafter *528the commission) in essence raises a single issue: Did the commission regularly pursue its authority in estimating that real party in interest Pacific Bell, then known as Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company (hereinafter Pacific), would incur $402.1 million in total company service connection costs—commonly known as installation costs—and consequently authorizing Pacific to raise its intrastate rates by $264 million to offset the effect of such…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- City of Los Angeles v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- City of Los Angeles v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Southern California Edison Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Southern California Gas Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Mountain Fuel Supply Co. v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- Iindustrial Customers of Idaho Power v. Idaho Public Utilities CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
- City of Huntington Beach v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.