Legal Opinion
PG&E Corp. v. Public Utilities Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 21, 2004No. A099858, A099863, A099864, A100892, A100895, A100896, A100897PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JONES, P. J.
I. INTRODUCTION
Disputing the jurisdiction of the Public Utilities Commission (PUC or Commission) over entities other than public utilities, the parent holding companies of California’s three large investor-owned electric utilities seek to be dismissed from a pending PUC proceeding investigating actions taken by the holding companies and their utility subsidiaries during the electricity energy crisis of 2000 and 2001. The holding companies and their utility subsidiaries also challenge an interim opinion of the PUC interpreting one of the conditions imposed at the time the…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Babb v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Wilson & Wilson v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Stonehouse Homes LLC v. City of Sierra MadreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Cellphone Termination Fee CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Gananian v. WagstaffeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Parkwest Homes v. Julie G. BarnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.