Legal Opinion

Southern California Edison Co. v. Peevey

California Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 2003No. S110662PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WERDEGAR, J.

Southern California Edison Company (SCE) sued the Commissioners of the California Public Utilities Commission (PUC) in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, claiming PUC’s regulation of electricity rates violated federal law in several respects. The parties later reached an agreement settling the action, which became the basis for a stipulated judgment proposed to the district court. The. Utility Reform Network (TURN), which had intervened in the action, opposed the stipulated judgment, claiming, among other things, that PUC’s agreement to *787…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sacramento Newspaper Guild, Local 92 v. Sacramento County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Roberts v. City of PalmdaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Consumers Lobby Against Monopolies v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Southern California Edison Co. v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Jacks v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. PG&E Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. Estate of Ford v. EicherSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  4. Trancas Property Owners Ass'n v. City of MalibuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Department of Water ResourcesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API