Scott v. Jackson
California Supreme Court
■ Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
— This is an action to recover the sum of fifteen hundred dollars, the contract price of several United States letters patent, sold by plaintiff’s assignor, Watkins, to defendant, under an agreement dated July 19, 1885. The contract of sale provided that Watkins should assign, deed, and deliver to defendant all of his patents for harvesting machinery for the sum of fifteen hundred dollars, one half of which was made payable November 1, 1885, and the balance November 1, 1886. The contract provided that the assignment was to be made as soon as a settlement was made by Watkins with Rice.
The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Swain v. SeamansSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
3Cited by25 opinions
- Carpy v. DowdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Dartnell v. BidwellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1916
- Dolbeer v. LivingstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Griffin v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
- Pope v. J. K. Armsby Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.