Ropes v. John Rosenfeld's Sons
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Action for commission alleged to he due plaintiff from defendant corporation on account of the sale by plaintiff of defendant’s steamer, the Peter Jebsen.
It is alleged in the complaint that plaintiff was at all times mentioned therein, and still is, doing business in the city of New York under the firm name of I. F. Chapman & Co., and that “R. J. Chapman of San Francisco, doing business under the firm name and style of J. F. Chapman & Co., was the agent of said plaintiff.” It is alleged that on the date above named R. J. Chapman as such agent entered into an agreement with…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Zeimer v. AntisellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Blumenthal v. GoodallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Fultz v. WimerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
- Goffe v. GibsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Hicks v. PostCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Elevator Operators & Starters' Union v. NewmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Brown v. MasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Houston v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Roth v. MoellerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.