Body-Steffner Co. v. Flotill Products, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLING, J. pro tem.
Defendant appeals from a judgment for damages rendered against it for failure to deliver certain canned tomatoes and tomato paste pursuant to six written contracts entered into between plaintiff and defendant. In five of the six contracts a standard form of printed contract of purchase and sale adopted by the Canners League of California and approved by the National-American Wholesale Grocers’ Association was used.
By typewritten reference in the body of each of these five contracts an attached multigraphed sheet dealing with certain contingencies that might arise out of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Ermolieff v. R. K. O. Radio Pictures, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Robbins v. Pacific Eastern Corp.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Fitch v. Kentucky-Tennessee Light & Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
- American Can Co. v. Ladoga Canning Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1930
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
- Beneficial Fire & Casualty Insurance v. Kurt Hitke & Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
- Lawrence Block Co. v. PalstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Union Oil Co. v. Union Sugar Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Schmidt v. MacCo Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.