Wilson v. Roppolo
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBray, P. J.
Defendants appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff for a real estate commission.
Question Presented
Did plaintiff produce a buyer ready, able and willing to buy within the time allotted in the listing agreement?
Record
It is conceded that on January 9,1956, plaintiff through his salesman, Carlson, received an “open” listing agreement from defendants authorizing him to sell certain real property belonging to them, and providing that defendants would pay a commission upon sale. The agreement provided: “This employment and authorization automatically cancels 6 months from date, on June 9,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gunn v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Twogood v. MonnetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Cone v. KeilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Bail v. GlantzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Palmtag v. DanielsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Arthur Rubloff & Co. v. Comco Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- Seck v. FoulksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Leadership Real Estate v. HarperNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- Duffy v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Never v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.