Legal Opinion
City of Cleveland v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 5, 1981No. 80-1340PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Per curiam
The threshold issue before this court is whether the street-lighting service is a “new service” within the purview of R. C. 4909.18. That section, in relevant part, provides:
“Any public utility desiring to establish any rate, joint rate, toll, classification, charge, or rental, or to modify, amend, change, increase, or reduce any existing rate, joint rate, toll, classification, charge, or rental, or any regulation or practice affecting the saíne, shall file a written application with the public utilities commission. ***If the commission determines that such application is not for an increase…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Georgia Power Co. v. Allied Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- City of Columbus v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Sellers v. Iowa Power and Light CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1974
- Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Armco, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Weiss v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Discount Cellular, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.