Legal Opinion
Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 15, 1981No. Nos. 80-1480, 80-1528 & 80-1547PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.
The scope of this court’s review of cornmis*156sion orders is set forth in R. C. 4903.13, which states in pertinent part:
“A final order made by the public utilities commission shall be reversed, vacated, or modified by the supreme court on appeal, if, upon consideration of the record, such court is of the opinion that such order was unlawful or unreasonable.”
“Under the ‘unlawful or unreasonable’ standard specified in R. C. 4903.13, this court will not reverse or modify an opinion and order of the Public Utilities Commission where the record contains sufficient probative evidence to show that the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Stores Realty Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- City of Columbus v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Ohio Utilities Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Attorney General v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Dayton Power & Light Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Armco, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- People's Organization for Washington Energy Resources v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1985
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.