Legal Opinion
Ohio Edison Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 6, 1992No. 90-2406PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Per curiam
Appeals arising from orders of the Public Utilities Commission are subject to the standard of review contained in R.C. 4903.13, which provides in part:
“A final order made by the public utilities commission shall be reversed, vacated, or modified by the supreme court on appeal, if, upon consideration of the record, such court is of the opinion that such order was unlawful or unreasonable.”
In MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1988), 38 Ohio St.3d 266, 268, 527 N.E.2d 777, 780, we repeated our interpretation of this standard, stating:
“Under the ‘unlawful or unreasonable’ standard…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Federal Power Commission v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Fortner v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1970
- Duquesne Light Co. v. BaraschSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Constellation NewEnergy, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- US West Communications, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- US West Communications, Inc. v. WASH. UTILITIES & TRANSP.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- AK Steel Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2002
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.