Matthews v. Digges
California Court of Appeal
APPEALS from a judgment of the Superior Court of Monterey County, and from an order denying an application to he relieved from the forfeiture of a lease. J. A. Bardin, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.
There are two appeals in this case presented in the same transcript—one an appeal from the judgment in the plaintiff’s favor; the other an appeal from an order made after final judgment denying the defendant’s application to be relieved from the forfeiture declared ■ by said judgment under, section 1179 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
The action was one in unlawful detainer after forfeiture of certain demised premises alleged to have arisen through the breach of certain covenants in the lease thereof by the plaintiff to certain lessees named Wood and Judge, assignors of the defendant. The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- German-American Sav. Bank v. GollmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- McGlynn v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Schnittger v. RoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Jones v. DurrerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Zucco v. FarulloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pfitzer v. CandeiasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Harris v. BissellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Extension Oil Co. v. Richfield Oil Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Salton Community Services District v. SouthhardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Hignell v. GebalaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.