Legal Opinion

Cavanaugh v. High

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 15, 1960No. Civ. 24568PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.

Appeal from judgment for plaintiff in unlawful detainer action. The main issue is whether a conventional relationship of landlord and tenant existed between plaintiff and defendant. The trial court found that it did. Subject to exceptions specified in section 1161, subdivision 1, and section 1161a, Code of Civil Procedure, that is sine qua non to maintenance of such an action. (Francis v. West Virginia Oil Co., 174 Cal.168, 170 [162 P. 394]; Fredericksen v. McCosker, 143 Cal.App.2d 114, 116 [299 P.2d 908] ; 30 Cal.Jur.2d, § 347, p. 486.)

By answer defendant denied that there was any landlord…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Beeler v. American Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Mahoney v. BostwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Chapman v. HicksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Francis v. West Virginia Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Husheon v. HusheonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Munger v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Estate of GeloneseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Develop-Amatic Engineering v. REPUBLIC MORTGAGECalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Garcia v. WetzelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Budaeff v. HuberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API