Legal Opinion
Holcomb v. U.S. Bank National Ass'n
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 8, 2005No. G034330PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ARONSON, J.
Plaintiff Scott P. Holcomb challenges orders of the trial court declaring him to be a vexatious litigant, requiring him to post a $10,000 bond, and dismissing his complaint when he failed to post the bond. In a separate motion to dismiss, defendants U.S. Bank National Association, John Kearney, and Mary Stone contend Holcomb was required to obtain leave of the presiding justice and post security before filing this appeal.
We deny defendants’ motion to dismiss because the trial court’s order was not a prefiling order under Code of Civil Procedure section 391.7 (all statutory…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- George Corey, Trust Fund v. New York Stock ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Martin v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Bravo v. IsmajCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Calhoun v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Childs v. PAINE WEBBER INCORPORATEDCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Fink v. ShemtovCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Golin v. AllenbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- In re Marriage of Rifkin & CartyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Morton v. WagnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- In re KinneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.