Legal Opinion

In re Marriage of Rifkin & Carty

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 6, 2015No. A139484PublishedCited by 17 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RIVERA, J.

This appeal arises from a long and contentious child custody dispute between appellant Richard A. Rifkin (Father) and respondent Kimberly Dawn Carty (Mother). In September 2012, the family court issued an order declaring Father a vexatious litigant and prohibiting him from filing any new litigation in proprio persona without first obtaining leave of court (the prefiling order), and ordered him to pay some of Mother’s attorney fees. It appears that Father filed an appeal of this order but failed to pursue it. Father later applied to vacate the prefiling order and remove his…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Shalant v. GirardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Kennedy v. EldridgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. In Re BittakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. Childs v. PAINE WEBBER INCORPORATEDCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Blizzard Energy v. SchaefersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
  2. Caron v. Cal. State Bd. of Pharmacy CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. Chaker v. Superior Court CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. Davey v. Graham CA6California Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. Drevaleva v. Alameda Health System CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2020

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API