Legal Opinion
Fink v. Shemtov
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 5, 2010No. G041557PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FYBEL, J.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff David Fink appeals from an order declaring him a vexatious litigant under Code of Civil Procedure section 391, subdivision (b)(1) and a prefiling order issued under section 391.7. (All further statutory references are to the Code of Civil Procedure unless otherwise specified.) He contends the orders must be reversed because he has not suffered at least five adverse final determinations in litigation matters within the past seven-year period.
We affirm. The trial court did not err because Fink has suffered an adverse final determination in at least six…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kowis v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- McCorkle v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Leone v. Medical Bd. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Bravo v. IsmajCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Childs v. PAINE WEBBER INCORPORATEDCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Frisk v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- State Farm General Insurance v. JT's Frames, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Sviridov v. City of San Diego, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- In re KinneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Garcia v. LaceyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.