Legal Opinion
Henderson v. Pierson
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 2, 1953No. 4544_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Chief Judge.
Henderson brought this action against Pierson and Cease to recover damages for the breach of an alleged contract of sale of dry cleaning equipment.
In February, 1950, and for a long ’period prior thereto, Pierson and Cease were engaged as partners in the dry cleaning business in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. On February 21, 1950, they were engaged in the construction of a building to house a new dry cleaning plant, which was rapidly near ing completion, and were desirous of purchasing dry cleaning equipment for the plant. They had opened negotiations with Henderson and three…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gamble v. RileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Brown v. American Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- Colonial Jewelry Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Yeager v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Commercial Nat. Bank of Muskogee v. AhrensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
3Cited by5 opinions
- Halliburton Company v. McPheronNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Frank P. Dayvault v. Baruch Oil Corporation, Kenilind Oil & Gas Co., Inc., and Baruch-Nettune & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- Cimarron Insurance Company, Inc. v. George PomeroyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- Kenneth Graves and Kenneth Davis v. Anschutz Oil Co., Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- Dunne Ford Sales, Inc. v. Continental Assurance Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1963