Halliburton Company v. McPheron
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
COMPTON, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant below dismissing the complaint of the plaintiff in its action to recover certain indebtedness of Bishop Canyon Uranium Corporation under a written letter of guaranty. The trial court found that the letter of guaranty was executed on the condition that it would not be effective and binding unless and until another person signed the same or a like guaranty, and concluded that on the failure of such other person to sign a like guaranty, the defendant did not become bound and obligated.
The sole issue before this court…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. CohenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936
- Mapes v. Santa Cruz Fruit Packing Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1946
- Allen v. MarcianoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1951
- Alexander v. KerhulasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
- Hensley Insurance Co. v. EcholsSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Charles L. Ricker v. B-W Acceptance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- Baum v. Great Western Cities, Inc., of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Northwestern Bank v. CortnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
- Padilla v. RRA, INC.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
- Edwin Denton v. Fireman's Fund Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.