Legal Opinion

Commercial Nat. Bank of Muskogee v. Ahrens

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 23, 1926No. 16285PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ESTES, C.

Parties appear here in the same order as in the trial court. Por a full statement of the facts in this case, see Ahrens v. Commercial Nat. Bank of Muskogee, 100 Okla. 250, 229 Pac. 237. There, the action of the trial court in granting plaintiff a new trial was sustained, and such new trial directed on plaintiff’s suit upon the notes herein referred to, and on defendant Ahrens’ first affirmative defense — the conditional delivery of the notes and whether plaintiff was a holder in due course. In 1920, Ahrens bought from Pilot Motor Sales Company a Pilot automobile under a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. First State Bank of Keota v. BridgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Gamble v. RileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Edwards v. City Nat. Bank of McAlesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Bank of Buchanan County v. PriestlySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  5. Waggoner Bank & Trust Co. v. DoakSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Yeager v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Commercial Trust Co. of New Jersey v. KealeyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
  3. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. HeilmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  4. Henderson v. PiersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
  5. Howard v. BiggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API