Legal Opinion

Gamble v. Riley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 23, 1913No. 2825PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Error from County Court, Stephens County; W. H. Admire, Judge. Action by L. P. Gamble against Chilion Riley and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROBERTSON, C.

This was an action by L. P. Gamble against Chilion Riley and Hugh B. Carter to recover a money judgment on a certain promissory note; it is alleged in the petition that on April 9, 1909, IT. B. Carter and Hugh B. Carter (one and the same person) made, executed, and delivered his note to Chilion Riley in the súm of $500, due six months after date, with interest at eight per cent, per annum until paid; that thereafter, before maturity, and for value, said Chilion Riley indorsed said note to plaintiff, who is now the legal owner and holder thereof; that the same is past…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tovera v. ParkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Colonial Jewelry Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Horton v. BirdsongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Lyons v. StillsTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Mitchell v. Altus State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Vincent v. RussellOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Central Bank of Bingham v. StephensUtah Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Yeager v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Hartley v. RileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  5. Republic Nat. Bank of St. Louis v. First State Bank of OiltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API