Legal Opinion

Brown v. American Nat. Bank

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 26, 1952No. 4279PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRATTON, Circuit Judge.

Robert Brown and Violetta C. Brown, husband and wife, instituted this action against American National Bank of Shawnee, Oklahoma, to recover judgment for usurious charges upon loan transactions with the bank. For convenience, reference will be made to Robert Brown as Brown, and to American National Bank either as American National or the Bank. Inasmuch as Violetta C. Brown merely joined her husband in the execution of certain notes and mortgages but took no other part in the transactions giving rise to the litigation, no further reference will be made to her.

It was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  2. Michoud v. GirodSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
  3. Mallow v. HindeSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  4. Stewart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  5. Gregory v. StetsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Town of MendonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  2. United States v. First Sec. Bank of Utah, N.A. United States v. Allen. United States v. Cota (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953
  3. Justheim Petroleum Co. v. HammondCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  4. Lessie B. Henry and Mildred Louise McDavis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  5. State Ex Rel. Remy v. City of NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API