Legal Opinion

Frank P. Dayvault v. Baruch Oil Corporation, Kenilind Oil & Gas Co., Inc., and Baruch-Nettune & Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 23, 1956No. 5182_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAH, Circuit Judge.

Upon remand of this case, Dayvault v. Baruch Oil Corp., 10 Cir., 211 F.2d 335, the trial court found that the parties to the suit had entered into a joint venture for the acquisition and development of the four oil and gas leases in suit, but as to the so-called Kenilind Lease (No. 078317), the court took the view that all discussions, negotiations and proposals concerning their respective interests therein were merged in the written agreement of June 17, 1949; that by the terms of such agreement and his own testimony, appellant agreed to accept 133,334 shares of stock…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bushnell v. ElkinsWyoming Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Garrett v. EllisonUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Dayvault v. Baruch Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  4. Jordan v. Hall-Miller Drilling Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
  5. Popplewell v. StevensonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Anderson-Prichard Oil Corp. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
  2. MediaNews Group, Inc. v. McCartheyDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2006
  3. Cimarron Insurance Company, Inc. v. George PomeroyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
  4. Anderson-Prichard Oil Corporation, a Corporation v. R. L. Parker, a Sole Trader, D/B/A Parker Drilling Company, R. L. Parker, a Sole Trader, D/B/A Parker Drilling Company, Cross-Appellant v. Anderson-Prichard Oil Corporation, a Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
  5. Rummery, Michael v. IL Bell Tele CoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API