Legal Opinion

Caskie v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 25, 1953No. Appeal, No. 75PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Chidsey,

The plaintiff in this ease became sick soon after drinking some of the contents of a bottle of Coca-Cola, manufactured, bottled and sold by the defendant. He brought this action in assumpsit claiming that defendant breached its implied warranty that the Coca-Cola was fit for human consumption in that it contained hydrochloric acid which caused injury and damages to the plaintiff. A jury awarded plaintiff §6,500. This appeal is from the judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff following the lower court’s dismissal of defendant’s motion for new trial. A motion…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rozumailski v. Philadelphia Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Boyle v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Tincher, T. v. Omega Flex, Inc., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Kassab v. SoyaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Mull v. Colt Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  4. Thompson v. ReedmanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Young v. Coca-Cola Bottling CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API