Legal Opinion

Tincher, T. v. Omega Flex, Inc., Aplt.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 19, 2014No. 17 MAP 2013PublishedCited by 238 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Chief Justice CASTILLE.

Omega Flex, Inc., appeals the decision of the Superior Court to affirm the judgment on the verdict entered in favor of Terrence D. Tincher and Judith R. Tincher (the “Tinchers”) by the Chester County Court of Common Pleas, Civil Division. We reverse the Superior Court decision in part, upon reasoning different from that articulated by the courts below, and we remand to the trial court for further action upon Omega Flex’s post-trial motions, consistent with the principles elucidated in this Opinion. We hold that:

1. This Court’s decision in Azzarello v. Black…

2Cases cited141 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Pegram v. HerdrichSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by238 opinions

  1. Parr, J. v. Ford Motor CompanySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Fassett v. Sears Holdings Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Barton v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Commonwealth v. Doughty, J., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Landau v. Viridian Energy PA LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016

233 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API