Legal Opinion

Young v. Coca-Cola Bottling Company

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided February 11, 1972No. 1350-AppealPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, C. J.

This civil action was brought to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained as a •result of consuming a portion of the contents of a bottle of Coca-Cola alleged to have been adulterated by the presence of a foreign substance. The complaint is in three counts, counts 1 and 2 charging the defendant with negligence and count 3 charging the defendant with a breach of an implied warranty of fitness for human consumption pursuant to the provisions of G. L. 1956, §§6A-2-315 and 6A-2-318, 1 the Uniform Commercial Code, so called.

The case was tried to a justice of the Superior Court…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Jacob E. Decker & Sons, Inc. v. CappsTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Vaccarezza v. SanguinettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. Griggs Canning Co. v. JoseyTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Manzoni v. Detroit Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Barefield v. La Salle Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. Providence Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
  2. Fiske v. MacGregor, Division of BrunswickSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
  3. Mattos, Inc. v. HashCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. Simpson v. DaileySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985
  5. Wright v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. of Central South DakotaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API