Legal Opinion

Kassab v. Soya

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 11, 1968No. Appeal, No. 213PublishedCited by 206 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Roberts,

Appellants, man and wife, are engaged in the business of breeding Charoláis cattle. On December 14, 1961 they placed an order for cattle feed with defendant-appellee, Pritts. This feed was to be blended by *220Pritts according to a formula previously used by appellants for their cattle and previously blended by Pritts. One of the ingredients in appellants’ formula was a commercially packaged feed supplement known as “Cattle Blend,” manufactured by defendant-appellee Central Soya. Pritts blended the feed supposedly according to appellants’ formula whereupon it was fed…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  3. Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Jacob E. Decker & Sons, Inc. v. CappsTexas Supreme Court · 1942

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by206 opinions

  1. Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Guy v. LiederbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Pennsylvania Glass Sand Corporation v. Caterpillar Tractor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  4. Gilbert v. Korvette's Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Nobility Homes of Texas, Inc. v. ShiversTexas Supreme Court · 1977

201 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API