Napa Valley Electric Co. v. Calistoga Electric Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff brought this action against the defendant to compel it to convey to plaintiff its properties on which it had given the defendant an option. The lower court sustained a demurrer to the plaintiff's amended complaint, the plaintiff elected not to amend, judgment was entered in favor of the defendant, and the plaintiff has appealed on the judgment-roll. The plaintiff is a public service corporation serving electric energy to the inhabitants of St. Helena, and the defendant is the same kind of a corporation serving the inhabitants of Calistoga. December 31, 1914, each corporation…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Berka v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Union Collection Co. v. BuckmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Levinson v. BoasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- O'Brien v. SheaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Lynch v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1906
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Tatterson v. KehrleinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Transport Clearings-Bay Area v. SimmondsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
- Crum v. Mt. Shasta Power Corp.California Supreme Court · 1934
- Slater v. Shell Oil CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.