Biggart v. Lewis
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. ' Milton K. Young, Byron Coleman and Lyndol L. Young for Appellant. W. C. Shelton, A. J. Hill, County Counsel, and Edward T. Bishop, Deputy County Counsel, for Respondents.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.
The plaintiff in this action sought to restrain by injunction the defendants, Lewis and Hunt, respectively auditor and treasurer of the county of Los Angeles, from auditing and paying a' demand purporting to have been allowed by the supervisors of said county in favor of the defendant Gibbon for services claimed to have been rendered by him in the promotion and organization of “Los Angeles County Water Works District No. 3.” Following an order sustaining a general demurrer to the plaintiff’s complaint without leave to amend, judgment was rendered and entered for the defendants, from which the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Schmidt v. WidberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Battelle v. Northwestern Cement & Concrete Pavement Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Linden v. CaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Gent v. Manufacturers & Merchants' Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
- County of Los Angeles v. LankershimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Herbert v. RiddellDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1952
- Estate of AkersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Wood v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Central Heights Improvement Co. v. Memorial Parks, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Chapman v. City of FullertonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.