Legal Opinion
McCann v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 27, 1978No. Civ. 50776PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ASHBY, J.
Defendants City of Los Angeles and City of Glendale appeal from a judgment based on breach of an easement agreement for damages in the amount of approximately $32,000.
Plaintiff purchased a piece of real property at 4570 Colorado Boulevard in the City of Los Angeles. He desired to construct a manufacturing facility, warehouse, and offices on it. The property was previously used only to stable horses and for pleasure horse riding.
When he purchased the property, plaintiff was aware that it was subject to a sewer easement purchased by the City of Glendale in 1925. A sewer running…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- City of Pasadena v. California-Michigan Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Faus v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Potter v. Northern Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1968
- Minard Run Oil Co. v. Pennzoil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Phillips Pipe Line Company v. RazoTexas Supreme Court · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Beyer v. Tahoe Sands ResortCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Van Klompenburg v. BergholdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- South Bay Senior Housing Corp. v. City of HawthorneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Hamilton Court, LLC v. East Olympic, L.P.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Hamilton Court, LLC v. East Olympic, L.P.California Court of Appeal · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.