Legal Opinion

Hamilton Court, LLC v. East Olympic, L.P.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 16, 2013No. B240052PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARMSTRONG, J.

Defendants East Olympic, L.P., a California limited partnership (East Olympic), and its general partner, Jack Wilder, appeal the *503judgment quieting title to an easement on certain commercial real property in favor of plaintiffs Hamilton Court, LLC (Hamilton Court) and 3650 Olympic, L.P. (3650 Olympic). Defendants contend that the trial court erred in applying the doctrine of merger of title to the facts of this case. We agree, and so reverse the judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Prior to 1983, East Olympic owned an entire city block on East Olympic Boulevard in Los…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kellogg v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Beyer v. Tahoe Sands ResortCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Van Klompenburg v. BergholdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. McCann v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tariwala v. MackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
  2. Tariwala v. MackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API