Van Klompenburg v. Berghold
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MORRISON, J.
Defendants Joseph Berghold and Kay Berghold appeal from a judgment enjoining them from maintaining gates across a private roadway easement owned by plaintiffs Jon Van Klompenburg, Sarah Van Klompenburg, Barbara Due, Joseph Due and Julie Due. Defendants contend the trial court erred in failing to consider whether the gates unreasonably interfered with plaintiffs’ use of the easement. We disagree and shall affirm the judgment.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs and defendants each own separate parcels of real property located outside Lodi. Defendants’ property abuts…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Shapiro v. San Diego City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Faus v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Scruby v. Vintage Grapevine, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- County of Sacramento v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- United Services Automobile Ass'n v. DalrympleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Planning & Conservation League v. Castaic Lake Water AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Schmidt v. Bank of America, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Beyer v. Tahoe Sands ResortCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Williams v. FagnaniAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Shoen v. Zacarias, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.