Legal Opinion

Phillips Pipe Line Company v. Razo

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1967No. B-48PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREENHILL, Justice.

Plaintiff, Emilio Razo, was injured when a bulldozer operated by his employer or employers, Monical & Powell, Inc. and T-T Construction Co., joint venturers, hit and ruptured a buried ethylene pipeline operated by defendant Phillips Pipe Line Company, causing an explosion and fire. The trial court entered judgment for Razo for $304,288 based on jury findings that Phillips was negligent in failing to bury its pipeline to a proper depth, in failing to inspect properly, and in failing to give proper warning of the presence of the pipeline. The trial court also granted an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pioneer Natural Gas Co. v. K & M PAVING CO.Texas Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Young v. HerringtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  3. PHILLIPS PIPE LINE COMPANY v. RazoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Coastal Conduit & Ditching, Inc. v. Noram Energy Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  2. Roberts v. Friendswood Development Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994
  3. Seaway Products Pipeline Co. v. HanleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2004
  4. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  5. Mobil Pipe Line Co. v. Smith, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1993

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API