Legal Opinion
Egekvist Bakeries, Inc. v. Benson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 15, 1932No. 28,873PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Defendants — the attorney general of the state, the county attorney of Hennepin county, and the state commissioner of agriculture, dairy, and food — appeal from an order enjoining them temporarily from enforcing the statute hereinafter dealt with. As in State ex rel. Benson v. Bd. of Co. Commrs. of Pine County, 186 Minn. 524, 243 N. W. 851, an amendatory statute is again questioned on account of supposed deficiency of title under art. 4, § 27, of the state constitution.
The original act is L. 1927, p. 480, c. 351 (2 Mason, 1927, §§ 7035-1 to 7035-4) entitled: “An act regulating the weight of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Watkins v. BigelowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Eaton v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Hyman v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1888
- State ex rel. Rice v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- State ex rel. Keith v. ChapelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Associated Builders & Contractors v. VenturaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Hassler v. EngbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Sverkerson v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Administrator of Veterans' Affairs v. U. S. National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- First National Bank v. Benton CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.