Legal Opinion
Associated Builders & Contractors v. Ventura
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 31, 2000No. C8-98-1383, C1-98-1385, C4-98-1428PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*295OPINION
STRINGER, Justice.
An amendment to the prevailing wage law providing that prevailing wages must be paid in all construction or remodeling projects of educational facilities exceeding $100,000 was enacted as part of a 1997 omnibus tax bill relating to tax relief and reform. Respondents Associated Builders and Contractors (Associated Builders), Independent School District No. 882 (ISD 882) and Wright Electric, Inc. (Wright Electric) challenge the constitutionality of the amendment claiming it violates the Single Subject and Title Clause of the Minnesota Constitution, Article IV, Section…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Johnson v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- State Ex Rel. Pearson v. Probate CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- State v. CassidySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- Winters v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Kolton v. County of AnokaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- State v. NetlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- TCI Business Capital, Inc. v. Five Star American Die Casting, LLC, Brian T. FlynnCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Prior Lake American v. MaderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- In re Pera Police & Fire Plan Line of Duty Disability Benefits of BrittainSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.