Legal Opinion

Hassler v. Engberg

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 6, 1951No. 35,328PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.

Appeal from an order of the district court denying a new trial.

Plaintiff is and has been the owner of a home in the city of St. Paul, with structures thereon consisting of a house and garage, and he also owned household goods located in his home. Defendant Engberg, referred to hereinafter as the agent, is a St. Paul agent for defendant Travelers Fire Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut, a foreign company admitted to do business in Minnesota, referred to hereinafter as Travelers. Plaintiff previously had fire insurance in Travelers on Ms. property amounting…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. New York Rapid Transit Corp. v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Monamotor Oil Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Nichols v. WalterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Guilliams v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Visina v. FreemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. State v. SuessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  4. Arens v. Village of RogersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  5. Federal Distillers, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API