Stenzel v. Bach
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Harold W. Schultz, Justice. *
This action arises as the result of personal injuries sustained by plaintiff Bruce Stenzel (hereafter plaintiff) while riding as a passenger in an automobile owned by Francis J. Bach and driven by his 18-year-old son, Francis J. Bach, Jr., both named as defendants herein. The trial court found, as a matter of law, that plaintiff was not negligent. Defendants appeal from the denial of their alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.
At the time of the accident, the 17-year-old plaintiff was seated in the right rear seat of the car…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Springrose v. WillmoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Lovejoy v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Ahlstrom v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Nees v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Hubenette v. OstbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Hill v. Okay Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Advanced Training Systems Inc. v. Caswell Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Frey v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Johnson v. SerraCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.