Legal Opinion
Frey v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 28, 1977No. 46872PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MacLAUGHLIN, Justice.
Plaintiffs, Merlon and Guelda Frey, commenced this action to recover damages allegedly caused by overheating from a space heater purchased from defendant, Montgomery Ward & Company, Inc. (Montgomery Ward), for use in a house trailer where plaintiffs bred and raised chinchillas for commercial purposes. Montgomery Ward then commenced a third-party action against McGraw-Edison Company (McGraw-Edison), manufacturer of the space heater, and Mc-Graw-Edison impleaded Robertshaw Controls Company (Robertshaw), manufacturer of the space heater control unit, as a fourth-party…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Tolbert v. Gerber Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- O'Leary v. WangensteenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Lovejoy v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- PLIVA, Inc. v. MensingSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Bilotta v. Kelley Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Germann v. F.L. Smithe MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Balder v. HaleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.