Legal Opinion
Lovejoy v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 7, 1956No. 36,922PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Knutson, Judge.
Plaintiff was employed as a farm manager by R. S. Kincaid on a farm in Washington County, in "ihis state. Among the machinery on the farm was a 1941 Minneapolis-Moline RT tractor purchased by Kincaid from J. L. Leighton Company, a dealer in farm implements located in Minneapolis/ There were other tractors on the farm, and the one involved here was used mainly for belt or power work, such as silo filling, shelling corn, sawing wood, and running other equipment. For that purpose it was equipped with a rotating pulley. The tractor and pulley were designed and manufactured by…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Greco v. S. S. Kresge Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Schubert v. J. R. Clark Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Hanson v. Homeland Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Erling David Larsen v. General Motors Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Comstock v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
- McCormack v. Hankscraft CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Adams v. Buffalo Forge Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Beck v. SpindlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.